Join us on Discord Chat! Lots of conversation happening there.
http://PNWBemani.net/discord

[Welcome, guest! Join our community today!]

Welcome, guest! Join our community today!

[Laura]

A lot of us have gotten into googlewhacking lately, so I figure that it probably deserves its own thread. Here are the official rules, copy-pasted from googlewhack.com:

Visit Google. Submit a query of two words, but don't use quote marks. (Quotes tell Google to find the enclosed words immediately adjacent - and that's just too easy!) Use no punctuation in your words, and no numbers (just 26 letters from A through Z). Find two words that return one result, then see whether Whack agrees (Whack may not see the same results you see). Whack only accepts words between 4 and 30 characters in length. (Any shorter or longer, again, that's just too easy!) To add to The Whack Stack, please respect these simple guidelines (Whack decides; no exceptions).
What are the rules?
Rule Number One: Your two Googlefactors must exist in Google's view of this dictionary. Not your view; Google's view! Google does the work, and Google has the final word! In the blue bar atop your Google results, accepted terms are linked, and so appear 'underlined.' No line, no link = Googlejack! (As in, You've got jack, so see the FAQ :-)

Rule Number Two: Google also is the arbiter of a whack's uniqueness. Look to the right end of the blue bar atop your Google results. If you see "Results 1 - 1 of (any number),' you found exactly one hit = Googlewhack!

Rule Number Three: Google shows you an excerpt of the page you whacked. Look at that text. If it's merely a list of words (such as a bibliography, concordance, encyclopedia, glossary, thesaurus, dictionary, domain names, or plain old machine-generated random garbage), No Whack For You!

That said, let's have some fun... GO AND LET THE GOOGLEWHACKING BEGIN!

[tada]

I'll start things off with:

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGGL,GGGL:2006-34,GGGL:en&q=isododecahedron+hippopotamus

EDIT> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=GGGL%2CGGGL%3A2006-34%2CGGGL%3Aen&q=magnamious+sashimi&btnG=Search

[Diggit_6]

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=coenciding+tourism
WOOHOO!!!

[Arkaaito]

It really doesn't seem like misspellings should count.

But then, doing it the right way is harder than I thought.  How the hell are there 44,100 results for saskatchewan tupperware?

[tada]

More importantly, how are there 73,100 results for social aspie?

Yet only about 600 for antisocial aspie...

[Diggit_6]

did i spell wrong? I'll try again. Geometric shapes seem to work well. much try!

EDIT: GOOGLE WHACK!!! http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=active&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=Dictionaraoke+polynomials&spell=1&safe=on

and BTW: http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Dictionaraoke

[ChilliumBromide]

close

GOOGLEWHACK!

[tada]

EDIT: Oops, other one contained a mispelling.  But I got another one in just three guesses.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=GGGL%2CGGGL%3A2006-34%2CGGGL%3Aen&q=rhombitruncated+amoeba&btnG=Search

[Diggit_6]

i kinda want to start a website, andjust look up working google whacks, and put those words somewehre on my website. that'd be awexome! HAHAHAH *evil laugh*

[Arkaaito]

No, really!

[ChilliumBromide]

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=opera&rls=en&hs=5yQ&q=loltitz+lollerbating&btnG=Search

[BLueSS]

Level 5 thread rez.

[ChilliumBromide]

Yup. ;P

[Schlagwerk]

And that's

Numberwang!

[ChilliumBromide]

My post was relevant.  Yours was amusing.  Between the two of us, we're not half bad.